Karate as the World Sees It — Decoding the Global Image of KARATE That Japan Rarely Notices

By /

🥋This essay was originally written in Japanese for a Japanese readership of karate enthusiasts. It is a survey — written from the vantage point of a writer based in Japan — of how people outside Japan perceive the word and the reality of “KARATE,” and of how sharply that perception can differ from the “common sense” held inside Japan. The aim is less to be exhaustive than to organize the key points, cite sources, and make the gap between the two visible. Where a phrase or assumption would be unclear to non-Japanese readers, explanatory glosses have been added.

Prologue — The Long Journey of the Word “KARATE”

Karate is no longer a local Japanese martial art. The World Karate Federation (WKF) lists roughly 200 member nations and territories (officially 201 as of 2026) and, in its own promotional materials, claims a community of “over 100 million fans and practitioners.” The International Olympic Committee (IOC), by contrast, describes the number of karate practitioners as “more than 10 million” on its official pages. The gap between these two figures comes down to a definitional question — who, exactly, counts as part of the “karate population” — but either way, there is no doubt that dōjō (training halls) are scattered across every continent on earth. And yet, when the word “KARATE” is spoken on a street corner somewhere abroad, the image it carries does not necessarily match what a Japanese person pictures when they hear the word karate.

For many people outside Japan, KARATE is consumed as a word that symbolizes the very outline of Japan as a country. Ninja, samurai, sushi, Toyota, Pokémon — KARATE is spoken of as one fragment among these. At the same time, the lived experience of people who have actually encountered karate in a real dōjō on their own street has begun to acquire a texture quite different from the image imprinted on them through entertainment. This essay tries, as carefully as possible, to trace the gap that lies between the two.

A caveat: the author is not intimately familiar with the karate scene in every region of the world. What follows is one sketch, assembled from English-language forums; from papers and articles written in English, German, Spanish, and other languages; and from publicly available materials issued by school-based organizations abroad. Readers are asked to treat it as an interim report.

How Widely Is the Word “KARATE” Actually Known Around the World?

Recognition of the word itself

The first thing to confirm is the sheer recognition of the word “karate.” In the English-speaking world, karate is a firmly established common noun with its own dictionary entry; both the Oxford English Dictionary and Merriam-Webster record it as “a Japanese system of unarmed combat.”

The French karaté, German Karate, Spanish kárate / karate, Portuguese karaté (European) / caratê (Brazilian), and Russian карате (current orthography; the older spelling каратэ also circulated) all appear as common nouns in the dictionaries of the major languages. If you look at long-term search volume on Google Trends, karate has held a stable baseline for the past two decades alongside judo, taekwondo, kung fu, muay thai, and jiu-jitsu. Assessed without favoritism, in the English-speaking world karate sits on the same tier as “sushi” — that is, a word of Japanese origin that has become part of the English lexicon.

The word is known; its substance is not

Recognition of a word and understanding of its substance, however, are two different things. Ask an ordinary person abroad “what is karate?” and the answers that come back are often along these lines:

  • “A Japanese fighting art, right? The thing Bruce Lee did.”
  • “The one where you wear a white robe and break boards.”
  • “That Karate Kid stuff.”
  • “The thing my kid takes lessons in at the strip mall down the road.”
  • “The one that became an Olympic sport once and then got dropped again.”

What becomes clear here — including the “Bruce Lee = KARATE” misconception that any Japanese person would find absurd — is that much of the general public abroad grasps KARATE as the representative member of a broad family of “Eastern martial arts.” The distinctions between Chinese martial arts (kung fu), Korean martial arts (taekwondo), and Japanese budō (judo, aikido, kendo, karate) are largely blurred, and KARATE functions, in part, as a catch-all label for the whole category.

Is the “mystic East” stereotype still alive?

The image of KARATE as continuous with ninja and samurai — an “Eastern mystique” — is the part that commentators inside Japan tend to overrate. In reality, for the younger generation in the English-speaking world today, KARATE is received less as “mystery” than as a “classic children’s after-school activity” or “a signifier of a macho movie genre.”

On the other hand, for the middle-aged and older — especially the generation that watched the 1970s–80s kung-fu film boom, and Jean-Claude Van Damme, Steven Seagal, Chuck Norris, and Jackie Chan in real time — KARATE is still located within a fantasy of “the Eastern master.” Here, Orientalism in Edward Said’s sense remains strongly present.

In other words, the layer of imagery attached to KARATE differs subtly by generation and region. “Ninja-and-samurai mystique,” “the cliché of the macho fight film,” “a suburban kids’ sport,” and “a naïve point-scoring Olympic event” — these four strata compose the overseas image of KARATE like a multiple exposure.

How Karate Is Represented in Media Outside Japan

Karate in entertainment

The most powerful supplier of the KARATE image abroad remains, to this day, screen entertainment. Listing the historically important works gives roughly the following:

  • Enter the Dragon (1973) — starring Bruce Lee. To a Japanese viewer this is unmistakably a kung-fu (jeet kune do) film, but much of the Western public took it to be a “KARATE movie.”
  • The Karate Kid (1984), its sequels, and Cobra Kai (2018–2025) — through the character of the Okinawan-lineage karate master “Mr. Miyagi,” these reinjected “spirituality,” “a culture of mentorship,” and “Eastern philosophy” into KARATE.
  • The B-movie action of Van Damme, Seagal, and Chuck Norris — these imprinted “the karate-esque” as a sign made of powerful roundhouse kicks and straight punches.
  • Karate Kid: Legends (2025) — an attempt to blend kung fu and KARATE, symbolizing the further fluidization of the overseas image of KARATE.

What these works share is that they depict KARATE as “a story of self-mastery achieved through the spiritual growth and physical discipline of the individual.” Unlike the “neighborhood dōjō” scene a Japanese person imagines, KARATE for the overseas audience often operates as a coaching-of-the-soul — a metaphor for existential and ethical discipline mediated by the master-student relationship.

Karate in the news

The frequency with which KARATE appears in news reporting changed dramatically around the Tokyo Olympics. At the 2020 Tokyo Games (held in 2021), KARATE became an official event for the first time, and the performances of Kiyou Shimizu, Ryo Kiyuna, Steven Da Costa, and Sandra Sánchez were reported worldwide. Because its exclusion from the Paris Games was decided immediately afterward, KARATE ended up being reported, somewhat ironically, as “a short-lived Olympic sport.”

Al Jazeera, for example, conveyed in an article titled “Making Olympic debut, karate fights for future place in Games” that KARATE was trying to prove its reason for existing on the Olympic stage.[1] Strong dissatisfaction over the Olympic exclusion was expressed among overseas karate enthusiasts, but what is interesting is that a fair number of competitors themselves said, in effect, “that format isn’t real KARATE anyway, so it’s just as well it was dropped.”

Discourse on social media, YouTube, and Reddit

To observe the contemporary transformation of the KARATE image abroad, the quickest route is to look at discussions on Reddit, YouTube, Twitter/X, and Instagram. A brief note on Reddit is in order here.

💬About Reddit — Reddit is one of the largest forum-style social platforms in the English-speaking world, launched in the United States in 2005. It hosts countless topic-based sub-communities called “subreddits,” including active boards for the martial arts such as r/karate, r/martialarts, r/Kyokushin, r/KarateCombat, r/taekwondo, r/aikido, and r/judo. Anonymity is high and moderation relatively light, so frank and sometimes inflammatory opinions surface easily. The Reddit voices cited in this essay should be read not as “representative of the English-speaking world” but as “one cross-section” of it.

The representative gaze on KARATE found on Reddit is polarized between the affectionate and the cynical. On subreddits such as r/karate and r/martialarts, threads regularly appear titled “Why is karate so looked down upon?” or “Why is Karate so disrespected in the whole Martial Arts Community?”, in which the love and hatred surrounding KARATE are argued out.[2] The typical cynical line is the “McDojo” critique — that the world is flooded with hollowed-out dōjō that hand out ranks and belt promotions for the sake of monthly fees. To this, enthusiasts retort, “What you’re looking at isn’t real KARATE.” The very exchange itself reveals the ambiguity of KARATE’s standing abroad.

Sport Karate and Full-Contact Karate — The Two Great Currents, Seen From Abroad

What “sport karate” means overseas

In Japanese, the phrase “sport karate” (supōtsu karate) usually points to the sundome (“pulled-strike,” non-contact-to-the-face) WKF rules — the competition practiced by the four-major-schools lineage governed by the Japan Karatedo Federation. In English, however, sport karate is often used more broadly, referring to point-based competitive KARATE in general. North America has its own open-tournament culture in the NASKA (North American Sport Karate Association) lineage, where a distinctly “show-like” competition — including extreme acrobatic and weapons forms — has developed independently.

The Japanese “sport karate” and the English “sport karate” therefore cannot be matched up by literal translation. Japan’s “JKF competition” is, in overseas terms, more readily understood as “WKF karate,” “Olympic-style karate,” or “point-stop karate.”

“Full-contact karate” overseas

Full-contact karate, by contrast, is broadly called “knockdown karate” or “full-contact karate” abroad as well, with the Kyokushin Kaikan and its splinter and successor organizations forming the core. Kyokushin, after the organizational fracture that followed the death of its founder Masutatsu Oyama in 1994, split into the IKO Matsui faction, Shinkyokushinkai (the Kenji Midori faction, formerly IKO2), the IKO Matsushima faction (formerly IKO3), the IKO Tezuka faction (formerly IKO4), the Kyokushin-rengōkai (founded 2001), and many others — but to enthusiasts abroad, all of them tend to be received collectively as “the legacy of Mas Oyama.”

Beyond the Kyokushin line there are the Ashihara Kaikan, Seidō Kaikan, Enshin Kaikan, Satō-juku, Shidōkan, and Byakuren Kaikan, and the Japan-originated Kūdō (the competition name of the Daidōjuku founded by Takashi Azuma in Sendai in 1981; renamed “Kūdō” in 2001, it has now spread to more than 50 countries and has a large competitive population in places such as Russia). Add the independently developed full-contact organizations of Europe and South America, and the geographic spread of overseas full-contact karate is extremely wide. In Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia in particular, there are regions where Kyokushin and other full-contact karate hold a status close to that of a national sport.

The asymmetry of the “traditional” label

A point worth stressing here is the asymmetrical way the label “traditional karate” is used. When the four-major-schools lineage (Shōtōkan, Gōjū-ryū, Shitō-ryū, Wadō-ryū) is called “traditional” inside Japan, the implication is usually that it stands in contrast to the full-contact lineage (often called the “practical” school), led by Kyokushin. That is, it is a label meaning “them (the pulled-strike people), as against us (the full-contact people).”

There is something historically inverted here. The classical KARATE that ran from Okinawan tōde (“Tang hand”) to its transmission to mainland Japan was, in the modern sense, neither “pulled-strike” nor “full-contact” — it was an unarmed art of self-defense. Through Ankō Itosu’s incorporation of karate into school physical education, Gichin Funakoshi’s transmission to the mainland, and postwar sportization, the four-major-schools lineage developed in the direction of “refraining from direct striking and competing safely under fixed rules.” Masutatsu Oyama, from the 1960s onward, advocated a “direct-strike system” in opposition to this and established his Kyokushin Kaikan.

In other words, calling today’s four-major-schools lineage “traditional” is a back-projection from the full-contact side after the Kyokushin-era history; it does not necessarily guarantee continuity with Okinawan tōde. Among researchers and enthusiasts abroad, a position with some following points this out: “What the Japanese call traditional karate is in fact modern Japanese karate, and the real tradition survives in the Okinawan karate of Okinawa.” Jesse Enkamp’s YouTube channel and books are a typical example.[3]

This twisted usage generates great confusion when reading overseas discussions. The word “traditional karate” refers, for some English speakers, to “the competitive KARATE of the four major schools,” and for others to “Okinawan tōde.” To avoid this confusion, the rest of this essay distinguishes among “the four-major-schools lineage,” “the Okinawan lineage,” and “the full-contact lineage.”

The Gap Between Karate Seen From Japan and KARATE Seen From Abroad

The mismatch between budō and “martial arts”

When a Japanese person says budō, behind the word lies a thick context: the “eighteen martial arts” of the Edo period, the Meiji-era unification of martial techniques, Jigorō Kanō’s systematization of judo, the prewar Dai Nippon Butoku-kai, the various postwar competitive federations, and the ideology of “beginning with courtesy and ending with courtesy,” “the cultivation of character,” and “the Way (dō).”

The English “martial arts,” by contrast, originally means “the arts of Mars, the god of war,” but in modern colloquial English it has become a broad term often pointing to “Eastern combat sports in general.” KARATE, Kung Fu, Taekwondo, Judo, Jiu-jitsu, Aikido, Muay Thai, Krav Maga — even Capoeira — are frequently lumped together as “martial arts.”

As a result, the Japanese budō and the foreign “martial arts,” though used as if they were almost the same word, have different centers of gravity. On the Japanese side, “self-discipline and the cultivation of character” is the core; on the foreign side, “combat technique and physical training” tends to be the core.

Five axes that produce the gap

Organized, the gap between the two can be reduced to the following five axes:

  1. Purpose: in Japan, “the Way”; abroad, “benefits” (self-defense / fitness / competition).
  2. Time: in Japan, “lifelong learning”; abroad, “a children’s lesson” or “an adult hobby.”
  3. Space: in Japan, “the neighborhood dōjō, schools, corporate clubs”; abroad, “a commercial dōjō inside a strip mall” or “one program at a fitness club.”
  4. View of schools: in Japan, “a school is something you belong to”; abroad, “a kind of brand.”
  5. View of rank: in Japan, “rank is merely an internal ladder”; abroad, the image of “black belt = the final goal” is strong.

Abroad there is a deeply rooted culture of “earn the black belt and quit.” Reddit and Quora frequently see posts like “I got my black belt at 16, then quit.” In the Japanese sense, shodan (first-degree black belt) means “you have finally arrived at the entrance,” but in many dōjō abroad, attaining first dan functions as a kind of graduation certificate.

“Belt inflation” and the reaction of overseas practitioners

Hence the widely shared “black-belt inflation” critique among serious practitioners abroad. One Reddit user rated “an American black belt as roughly the level of a European or Japanese yellow belt,” to which another responded, “No — even a good European dōjō is better than the average American one, but compared with a real dōjō in Japan, the difference is obvious.” Such exchanges repeat endlessly.[4]

This discourse functions as a device that reproduces, among overseas practitioners, a somewhat romanticized image of “the Japanese dōjō as the real thing.” The actual scene in a Japanese dōjō is often neither as mystical nor as severe as is imagined abroad — but that very gap frequently produces the bewilderment of overseas practitioners who come to Japan on “training pilgrimages.”

Points of Contact With KARATE Abroad — Imagination and Reality

KARATE on the street corner

Visit a city abroad and you will see signs reading “Karate,” “Martial Arts,” “Karate & Taekwondo School,” or “Family Martial Arts” tucked into shopping malls and residential corners. In the North American suburbs in particular, “family martial arts” forms a major industry; alongside the pizza place, the nail salon, and the dental clinic, the commercial dōjō has become a standard local business type.

This kind of dōjō is an extremely refined business model: automatic monthly billing, lock-in contract periods, an exam fee for every promotion test, uniform sales, summer camps, birthday-party venue rental — in effect a hybrid of a fitness club and a children’s lesson business. What is taught ranges widely — KARATE, Taekwondo, Karate-Jutsu, Kempo, American Freestyle, eclectic blended systems — and its quality is decidedly mixed.

The existence of serious dōjō

There are, of course, serious dōjō with little commercial coloring all over the world: small European dōjō that keep training by inviting instructors from Okinawa; provincial Russian dōjō that host a Kyokushin headquarters master every year; bases in Brazil and South Africa with a resident JKA-dispatched instructor; small-group study circles in the Kenji Ushiro or kobudō (classical weaponry) lineages. The students of these dōjō are often adults who engage with KARATE as a life’s work, not as a temporary lesson for school or career.

The polarization between commercial dōjō and seriously oriented dōjō is an essential feature of the overseas KARATE landscape. What Japanese people often overlook is the fact that the sheer presence of the commercial dōjō flooding street corners abroad overwhelms the number of seriously oriented ones. The “real KARATE” that Japanese people take pride in is preserved abroad, relatively, as a minority cultural capital — kept alive within small communities of specialists.

Between entertainment and reality

Many beginners abroad first long for KARATE through screen entertainment (The Karate Kid in earlier days, Cobra Kai more recently), and then knock on the door of a commercial dōjō nearby. Here lies the peculiar double structure of the overseas KARATE image. The KARATE on screen is a symbol of a Miyagi-esque spiritual world; the KARATE of reality is a lesson you send your child to for roughly USD 150–250 a month. Both share the same label, “KARATE,” yet the experiences they offer are utterly different.

Practitioners who reach a seriously oriented dōjō are the minority who try to break this double structure from within. Disillusioned with the commercial dōjō, they gather information for themselves, read specialist books in English (Patrick McCarthy, Mark Bishop, Joe Swift, and others), watch Jesse Enkamp’s videos on social media, and, where possible, plan training trips to Okinawa or mainland Japan. They form the spiritual backbone of overseas KARATE culture.

Karate as a Profession, Seen From Abroad

The career structure of professional karateka in Japan

The typical career of a professional karateka (karate practitioner) in Japan can be organized roughly as follows:

  1. Becoming independent as a dōjō operator and instructor — the equivalent of the “teaching pro” in other sports.
  2. Being employed as an instructor by an organization such as a university, a corporate team, the Self-Defense Forces, or the police.
  3. Working as staff or instructor at the JKF or a school’s headquarters.
  4. Turning a KARATE background into a career in professional combat sports. Even in Japan there is a continuous, if small, presence of Kyokushin-derived kickboxers and MMA fighters.
  5. Otherwise, a “talent business that draws on KARATE as a resource” — YouTuber, book author, product development, coaching consultant.

In Japan, axes 1 and 2 in particular are stable pillars. Despite the effects of a declining birthrate and the COVID-19 pandemic, the role model of “the neighborhood dōjō teacher” still survives in some numbers.

Professional karateka abroad

The structure above is broadly transplantable abroad, but the thickness of each path differs from Japan.

  • Running a dōjō: in North America, Western Europe, and Australia, there certainly are KARATE instructors earning anywhere from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars a year as commercial dōjō operators. Most of them, however, run a mixed-martial-arts school that combines KARATE with Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Muay Thai, kickboxing, and fitness boot camps, rather than KARATE alone. A dōjō that can make a living on pure KARATE by itself is, globally, a rarity.
  • Salary as a national-team athlete: in countries that invest national budgets in KARATE — France, Spain, Turkey, Egypt, Iran, Azerbaijan, Russia (with current restrictions) — there is a career path of holding military rank as a national-team athlete and drawing a salary. French KARATE in particular is competitively strong, backed by budget allocations from the national sports agency.
  • Crossing over to professional combat sports: major MMA promotions such as the UFC feature a steady number of KARATE-rooted fighters — Lyoto Machida (Shōtōkan), Stephen Thompson (American Kenpo and point karate), Robert Whittaker (Gōjū-ryū), Kyoji Horiguchi (Shōtōkan, 2nd dan), Uriah Hall (Kyokushin, 2nd dan), Guy Mezger (taekwondo 8th dan and two-time full-contact karate world champion). But compared with boxing, wrestling, Muay Thai, and BJJ, fighters who make KARATE their “main axis” are clearly a minority.
  • Karate Combat as an exception: launched in 2018, Karate Combat is a professional league built around KARATE-rooted fighters, broadcasting internationally under rules featuring a pit-style ring, full contact with head strikes allowed, and takedowns with limited ground striking. It is worth watching as a new attempt to professionalize KARATE, though commercially it trails the UFC, ONE, Bellator, and PFL.
  • Instructor dispatch: organizations such as the JKA, SKIF, ITKF, WKF, IKO, and Shinkyokushinkai run systems for dispatching instructors to countries abroad. Salary levels vary greatly by country and organization.

How overseas practitioners view the “Japanese-style career”

A career of “making a living on KARATE alone,” like that of the neighborhood dōjō teacher in Japan, is often idealized by overseas practitioners and at the same time grasped as “an aspiration that is hard to sustain economically.” On Reddit, the naïve question “How do dojo owners actually make a living?” is posted frequently, and most respondents give realistic answers: “dōjō operation as a side business,” “combination with other martial arts,” “a focus on children’s classes.”

In short, both abroad and in Japan, it is in principle possible to make a living centered on KARATE, but the economic models for doing so are extremely limited. The reality — that the great majority of dōjō owners worldwide continue KARATE as a livelihood while backed by a family business, a separate main job, or a spouse’s income — does not differ much abroad.

How Sport Karate’s Kata and Kumite Are Received Abroad

Overseas evaluation of kata (forms)

Overseas evaluation of kata is polarized. On one side is a lineage of researchers and enthusiasts who respect kata as the core of KARATE and try to decode the historical meaning of its movements. Patrick McCarthy’s Bubishi research, Iain Abernethy’s practical kata bunkai (application analysis), Kris Wilder’s kata-based bunkai, and, in Japan, the research of Kenji Ushiro and others, carry a degree of influence in the English-speaking world as well; among seriously oriented practitioners abroad, kata is treated as a “moving classical text.”

On the other side, especially among competition-oriented full-contact practitioners and commentators who sneer at sundome competition itself, kata tends to be dismissed as “dance” or “a meaningless routine.” Reddit frequently sees the question “Why do we still practice kata if it doesn’t work in a real fight?”

As for Olympic kata competition, overseas opinion splits further still. Those who praise its “beauty,” “synchronization,” and “flashy performance” clash with those who dismiss it as “not KARATE but gymnastics” in the comment sections of Twitter and YouTube.

Overseas evaluation of kumite (sparring)

WKF-rules sundome kumite is a classic case where overseas combat-sports fans divide. Positive assessments concentrate on praise for its refinement as a competitive sport: “the distance management is beautiful,” “the exchange of feints and counters is technically sophisticated,” “the footwork is fast.”

Negative assessments concentrate on the critique that it is a ritualized competition detached from a real exchange of blows: “punches are pulled,” “one point and stop,” “too much choreography.” Fans centered on MMA frequently mock WKF kumite as “fake fighting,” to which the karate side responds, “that isn’t fighting, it’s a sport” — a mismatch that has become formulaic.[5]

At the 2021 Tokyo Olympics, in the men’s kumite +75kg final, Saudi Arabia’s Tareg Hamedi, while ahead, landed a clean high roundhouse kick on Iran’s Sajad Ganjzadeh and was disqualified — an incident that symbolized the overseas debate. Voices criticizing “KARATE’s rules are absurd” and voices defending “that was a legitimate decision in light of KARATE’s rules” clashed fiercely on social media abroad.

A longing for “KARATE as performance”

On the other hand, the aesthetic view that grasps kata and KARATE’s basic movements as “moving sculpture” or “calligraphy written with the body” enjoys deep-rooted support abroad as well. To the repetitive movements a Japanese person simply calls “kata practice,” overseas practitioners frequently approach with a more spiritual and aesthetic vocabulary: “meditative,” “flow state,” “moving zen.” This is continuous with the Western interest in Zen and mindfulness, and underpins a discourse that reconstructs KARATE not as a mere combat sport but as a practice of self-cultivation.

The Devotees of Full-Contact Karate Abroad

The flourishing of the Kyokushin lineage in the former Eastern bloc, Eastern Europe, and Russia

Looking at the geographic distribution of full-contact karate, the densest layers are formed by the former Soviet sphere centered on Russia; the Eastern Europe of Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Romania; and Japan.

The flourishing of the Kyokushin lineage in Russia begins in the late Soviet period. Western sports were officially restricted in the USSR of the time, but Russia had a thick traditional combat-sport culture (sambo, wrestling, boxing), and KARATE was accepted as “an alien but highly physical discipline.” After the Cold War, Kyokushin rapidly expanded its network of dōjō within Russia, and has since produced multiple Russian world champions. Tajik and Kazakh fighters have also been strong in recent years.

Kyokushin and the “underdog” feeling in North America

The Kyokushin lineage’s share in North America is limited compared with Europe and Japan. One Reddit poster, in a thread titled “Full contact karate is respected everywhere but the US,” laments the phenomenon of full-contact KARATE being slighted in America alone.[6]

The reasons often cited for why Kyokushin never fully caught on in America include:

  • In the 1970s–80s, the American karate world came to be dominated by “American kickboxing” — Joe Lewis, Bill Wallace, Chuck Norris, Benny Urquidez — which established its own independent line.
  • From the 1980s, commercial karate (McDojo culture) expanded explosively, and the hard-line full-contact dōjō struggled to survive financially.
  • From the 1990s, with the rise of MMA and BJJ, a consensus formed that “if you want to learn striking arts, do Muay Thai or boxing.”

As a result, Kyokushin in America is placed in an underdog-like position: “minor, but defended by an enthusiastic core.” This is often spoken of as a set with the broader “commercial-karate critique” of North American KARATE culture as a whole.

Brazil and South America

KARATE culture in Brazil has followed a development different from North America’s. Against the backdrop of a Japanese immigrant presence, Japanese budō arrived before the war, and the Brazilian Karate Federation boasts the largest scale in South America. Kyokushin too entered Brazil early and produced top finishers in world tournaments such as Glaube Feitosa, Francisco Filho, and Ewerton Teixeira. The distance to MMA is also short; from the Lyoto Machida brothers onward, it is not unusual to find Brazilian MMA fighters with karate body-mechanics mixed into the foundation of their striking.

The Middle East and North Africa

Iran, Egypt, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and the Caucasus region are home to a row of KARATE powerhouses. In these countries, the competitive KARATE of the four-major-schools lineage (especially Shōtōkan and Gōjū-ryū) is positioned as a national-team event, and athletes are treated as holders of military or police rank. Full-contact lineages exist in parallel, but the dominance of competitive WKF-style KARATE is striking.

A profile of the devotee

Sketching the overseas devotee of full-contact karate — at the risk of stereotype — the following image emerges:

  • A core of men aged 20–45 (with the proportion of women gradually rising).
  • Often holding a background in boxing, Muay Thai, kickboxing, or MMA as well.
  • Many share the narrative, “I came up in Shōtōkan, but grew dissatisfied with pulled strikes and converted to Kyokushin.”
  • A higher proportion than at commercial karate dōjō of people in occupations that demand physicality — soldiers, police officers, bodyguards.
  • Familiar with Masutatsu Oyama’s English-translated works (This is Karate, The Kyokushin Way: Mas Oyama’s Karate Philosophy, and others) and with numerous legendary anecdotes such as the 100-man kumite.

What is interesting here is that many overseas Kyokushin devotees have a stronger tendency than their Japanese counterparts to read Masutatsu Oyama “ideologically and philosophically.” Oyama’s self-mythologizing narration, often criticized in Japan as theatrical and exaggerated, is received abroad with an open mind as “the words of an Eastern sage” and read as a text of life philosophy.

Japanese Budō Seen From Abroad — A Comparison With Judo, Aikido, and Kendo

Judo — established as an Olympic sport

Judo’s standing abroad differs greatly from KARATE’s. Ever since it became an official event at the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, judo has been consistently established as an Olympic sport. The International Judo Federation functions as a highly centralized international body, and the standardization of rules and the international standardization of rank certification have advanced. France is said to be a “judo superpower” with a judo population exceeding Japan’s, boasting stars such as David Douillet and Teddy Riner.

Judo abroad has a far lower degree of “McDojo-ization” than KARATE. This is due to its standardization as an Olympic sport, its systematization within French and Japanese educational institutions, and the high degree of univocality of its competition rules.

From KARATE’s side, judo is the role model of “a budō that succeeded in institutional design.” At the same time, the critique that “as the price of institutional design, the essential budō dimensions (the old-style jūjutsu and self-defense aspects) were pushed aside” is raised from the lineage that reads Jigorō Kanō critically.

Aikido — “soft Eastern philosophy”

Aikido abroad occupies yet another place from KARATE. Partly through the influence of Steven Seagal’s films, aikido carries an image of “Eastern soft power,” “graceful techniques that use the opponent’s force,” and “a spirituality continuous with Zen.” It pairs well with practitioners of yoga, zazen, and mindfulness, and several overseas martial-arts magazines report the observation that its age range is somewhat higher than KARATE’s and that it has a higher proportion of practitioners in intellectual professions.

On the other hand, aikido is also treated as the representative case of the doubt “does it actually work in a real fight?”, and Reddit sees the thread “Does aikido work in MMA?” almost weekly. The schismatic splitting beginning with Morihei Ueshiba’s disciples (Aikikai, Yoshinkan, Iwama-ryū, Yōseikan, Shin Shin Tōitsu Aikidō) is even more finely divided than KARATE’s, but abroad it is broadly recognized collectively as “Aikido.”

Kendo — a quiet presence

Kendo is a less conspicuous presence abroad than KARATE, judo, or aikido. The reasons reduce to the cost of acquiring weapons and armor, the difficulty of securing practice space, the non-intuitiveness of the rules, and the small size of the competitive population. Even so, communities that doggedly continue kendo are dotted across Europe, North America, South America, and Southeast Asia, and the World Kendo Championships has grown to a scale with more than 50 participating countries.

For overseas practitioners, kendo often holds a special status as “the most Japanese of the Japanese martial arts.” Among the budō, it carries an especially strong image linked directly to “Zen,” “the samurai,” and “Japanese culture,” and practitioners often enter seeking “cultural immersion.”

KARATE’s relative position among the budō

Roughly organized, the order in which people abroad picture “Japanese budō” probably runs like this:

  1. KARATE: the most famous. Its recognition through entertainment is overwhelming.
  2. Judo: established as an Olympic sport.
  3. Aikido: individualized through a spiritual, philosophical image.
  4. Kendo: supported by connoisseurs. Strongly colored by Japanese culture.
  5. Jūjutsu / Ninjutsu: the names are widely known through films and games depicting samurai and ninja, but dōjō where one can actually practice old-style jūjutsu or ninjutsu are almost impossible to find abroad; most people who “want to do jiu-jitsu” end up attending a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ — a grappling and joint-lock art developed independently in Brazil from that lineage) dōjō.
  6. Iaidō / Kyūdō / Naginata: for a small minority of specialist enthusiasts.

KARATE sits at the apex of a triangle: first in “general public recognition,” but yielding to aikido and kendo in “spiritual depth” and to judo in “completeness as a competition.” This is probably the naïve consensus view held by people abroad.

A Comparison With Other Asian Combat Arts

Taekwondo — KARATE’s greatest rival

KARATE’s greatest rival abroad is, without doubt, Taekwondo. Taekwondo has been consistently adopted as an Olympic sport since the 2000 Sydney Games, and the degree of its international infrastructure exceeds KARATE’s. The organized support of the Korean government, the central management of rank by the Kukkiwon, and the institutional design of World Taekwondo (WT) all run a step ahead of KARATE.

Moreover, taekwondo is linked to South Korea’s strategic cultural export; Korean embassies and Korean cultural centers abroad are involved in promoting it. KARATE, by contrast, has relatively thin national-policy backing from the Japanese side, and the fragmentation into schools and organizations means its international expansion lacks a single direction.

To the general public abroad, taekwondo and KARATE are frequently confused. Asked the difference, overseas martial artists generally explain: “taekwondo is kick-centered, KARATE balances punches and kicks,” “taekwondo has flashier jumping kicks, KARATE is more linear and classical,” “taekwondo is Korean, KARATE is Japanese.”[7]

Historically, taekwondo was reorganized into a distinctive system tied to Korean national identity, on a base of the Shōtōkan karate that flowed into 1940s–50s Korea. Few enthusiasts abroad can discuss this historical background, and a fruitless nationalistic dispute over “which is older, taekwondo or KARATE” or “which is the origin” is often re-enacted.

Kung fu (Chinese martial arts) and tai chi

Kung fu (gōngfu, wushu, Chinese martial arts) is, alongside KARATE, a representative “Asian martial art” abroad. Through the screen expression of Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, and Jet Li, it bears, in the West, an image of “the mystic Eastern martial art” even more than KARATE. In contemporary China, by contrast, martial arts are competitively organized as wushu taolu and sanda under the General Administration of Sport, and traditional quanfa is quietly transmitted in their shadow.

From the perspective of overseas practitioners, kung fu is often positioned as “older and more mystical than KARATE.” There is some historical truth to this (part of KARATE’s roots can be traced to the White Crane and Southern Fist systems of southern Fujian), but it also contains exaggeration. The subreddit r/kungfu hosts a thread, “Western people calling kung fu useless/hating on kung fu,” lamenting the disdain for kung fu in the West.[8] As with KARATE, an excess image produced by entertainment and the sneering of a modern combat-sport viewpoint contend with each other.

Tai chi is received abroad almost entirely as a “health and meditation method,” with its combat-art aspect marginalized. The scene of elderly groups performing morning tai chi in a park is a fixture of London, New York, and Paris. The discourse on KARATE’s “health benefits as physical exercise” is also often discussed in connection with tai chi.

Muay Thai

Muay Thai is evaluated on a different axis from KARATE. Among overseas combat-sport fans, it tends to be highly respected as “one of the pinnacles of practical striking arts.” The professional Muay Thai culture within Thailand, the existence of nak muay (Muay Thai practitioners and fighters) who accumulate long competitive experience, the practical rules that include elbows, knees, and clinch work, and its success in K-1, GLORY, and ONE Championship all guarantee Muay Thai’s “authentic feel.”

Compared with KARATE, Muay Thai is relatively rarely criticized with the word “McDojo.” This is because Muay Thai has a clear practical evaluative axis as a professional competition in its homeland of Thailand, and overseas Muay Thai gyms are often run by instructors with “several years of training experience in the homeland.”

From KARATE’s side, Muay Thai is “a success story of striking technique cultivated in its pure form,” and is often spoken of with both envy and respect. Many full-contact karateka trained with Muay Thai as a sparring partner in their youth and absorbed that experience into their own striking.

The relationship with BJJ and MMA

Finally, what is growing most in the contemporary world combat-sport market is Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) and mixed martial arts (MMA). KARATE is frequently criticized against these as “old,” “not practical,” “weak on the ground because it is striking-only.”

In recent years, however, with Lyoto Machida and Stephen Thompson succeeding in the UFC in a karate style, and with the rise of Karate Combat, KARATE’s distance management, footwork, and counter-striking are being re-evaluated. Among overseas MMA coaches, a growing number incorporate karate-style angles into their fighters’ striking, and the narrative “Karate is back” is repeatedly advanced on social media and YouTube.

The Multiplicity of Schools and Organizational Splits — Overseas Bewilderment

Countless schools and organizations

The number of KARATE schools and organizations is something even specialists cannot grasp precisely. The four major mainland schools alone are Shōtōkan, Gōjū-ryū, Shitō-ryū, and Wadō-ryū, each with dozens of derivative organizations. In the Okinawan lineage there are Uechi-ryū, Shōrin-ryū (several systems), Gōjū-ryū (the Okinawan version), Matsubayashi-ryū, and others. The full-contact lineage continues with Kyokushin, Shinkyokushin, Ashihara, Seidō, Enshin, Byakuren, Shidōkan, Satō-juku, Seidōjuku, and so on, and on top of this there are countless organizations calling themselves “○○ Karate” or “○○-dō,” independently organized in each country and city.

Even at the level of international organizations, there is a proliferation — WKF, WUKF, JKA, SKIF, IKO (multiple factions), Shinkyokushin, KWF, ITKF, ISKF — and for overseas practitioners it is not even easy to understand “where the KARATE I am learning is positioned.”

Overseas bewilderment as seen on Reddit

Reddit’s r/karate regularly sees the thread “Why are there so many karate organizations?” The Karate Combat–related r/KarateCombat even hosts a post titled “This Bizarre idea that Karate can only be Japanese or Okinawan,” from which one can read the fatigue of overseas practitioners with debates over KARATE’s “orthodoxy.”[9]

Typical response patterns can be classified roughly as follows:

  1. The historical-explanation camp: schismatic splitting is not unique to KARATE; it is a phenomenon seen in martial arts generally, the complex result of the iemoto (headmaster) system, oral-transmission doctrine, and interpersonal friction.
  2. The cynical camp: the number of schools equals the number of founders’ egos and trademark businesses.
  3. The resigned camp: whatever organization you belong to, it is enough if you can receive good instruction at your own dōjō.
  4. The reformist camp: the fractured state is organizationally unhealthy; it should be unified under the JKA / the WKF should be strengthened / it should all be reorganized from scratch.

Independent overseas paths

Abroad, there are also many school branches that keep a distance from the intentions of the Japanese headquarters and walk an independent path. It is not unusual for a particular North American branch of a school to conduct its own rank certification separately from the Japanese headquarters, run its own tournaments, and customize everything down to the details of logos and uniforms. While the headquarters may view this as “a deviation lacking legitimacy,” local practitioners support it as “the real thing, localized” — a dual evaluation that coexists.

The fate of overseas branches in the wake of the Kyokushin split (the IKO Matsui faction, Shinkyokushinkai [Kenji Midori faction], the IKO Matsushima faction, the IKO Tezuka faction, and the several subsequent reorganizations after the 1994 death of Masutatsu Oyama) is the typical example. Many overseas branches took the split as an opportunity to distance themselves, either becoming independent organizations or surviving by maintaining loose relationships with multiple headquarters.

Attempts at unification, and their limits

The WKF (World Karate Federation) has aimed at unification within an “Olympic-friendly” framework centered on the four-major-schools lineage, but the full-contact, classical, and martial-arts-oriented KARATE schools do not fit under the WKF umbrella. Conversely, the WKF’s drive for unification has drawn the criticism that it dilutes each school’s distinctive techniques and historicity.

From the overseas practitioner’s perspective, this is often understood as “a trade-off between unification and diversity.” KARATE, by choosing division, may be preserving what judo and taekwondo lost as the price of choosing unification (the breadth of the old styles, the distinctive philosophy of each school) — a kind of defense of fragmentation can be constructed.

The Future of the Overseas KARATE Image — Three Hypotheses

Building on the discussion so far, I would like to offer three hypothetical scenarios for how the overseas image of KARATE might change.

Hypothesis 1 — KARATE in an age without the Olympics

If non-adoption continues through the Paris and Los Angeles Games, KARATE will lose the brand resource of “Olympic sport,” and the world strategy that leans heavily on competitive KARATE will be forced to rethink. This headwind, however, is not all bad. “KARATE as budō,” “Okinawan-lineage KARATE,” and “practical KARATE,” all keeping their distance from WKF-style competitive KARATE, may relatively gain in presence.

Hypothesis 2 — KARATE re-evaluated by way of MMA

As the styles of Machida and Thompson are imitated and analyzed in MMA gyms around the world, KARATE’s distance, timing, and counters are being incorporated into the standard vocabulary of contemporary combat sports. If Karate Combat’s promotion stabilizes, the career path of “a professional full-contact KARATE league” may become a realistic one.

Hypothesis 3 — KARATE as a cultural resource

Mass entertainment like Netflix’s Cobra Kai, “KARATE tourism” tied to travel to Okinawa, and KARATE as a soft-power strategy of traditional culture — this direction of cultural-resource-ification is proceeding independently of competitive KARATE. If the Japanese side consciously operates this context, there is considerable room to improve KARATE’s standing abroad.

These are, of course, no more than conjecture. Readers will have to verify each hypothesis in their own respective fields.

Conclusion — What Can Japan Learn From the Overseas Image of KARATE?

This essay has attempted to organize, from as many angles as possible, the impression that people outside Japan hold of the word and the reality of “KARATE.” To restate the main points:

  • The word KARATE has become very nearly a common noun in English and the other major languages.
  • Yet there is a large divergence between recognition of the word and understanding of its substance.
  • The overseas image of KARATE is a multiple exposure of several layers — entertainment, the commercial dōjō, serious practitioners, competitive KARATE, full-contact KARATE.
  • The label “traditional” is a relative naming from the full-contact side, and does not necessarily guarantee continuity with Okinawan tōde.
  • Most overseas practitioners receive KARATE along one of the axes of “a children’s lesson,” “fitness,” “self-discipline,” “competitive sport,” or “practical combat art,” with a center of gravity different from the “karate as budō” that Japanese people assume.
  • Making a living from KARATE abroad is in principle possible, but instructors who can live on pure KARATE alone are a global minority.
  • Evaluations of kata and kumite are polarized, with affirmative and negative camps coexisting abroad as well.
  • Full-contact KARATE has a thick layer of devotees in the former Eastern bloc, Eastern Europe, Russia, and Japan, and is relatively minor in North America.
  • For overseas practitioners, the Japanese budō — KARATE, judo, aikido, kendo — each play a different role.
  • The fragmentation of KARATE’s schools and organizations can appear to overseas practitioners as a “Japanese cultural idiosyncrasy.”

As a Japanese person, one can receive the overseas image of KARATE with two attitudes. One is the conservative posture: “overseas KARATE is inauthentic; the real thing exists only in Japan.” The other is the open posture that acknowledges, “KARATE is no longer Japan’s alone, but a culturally pluralistic body that has undergone its own evolution in every part of the world.”

This writer is closer to the latter position. The diverse interpretations that overseas KARATE enthusiasts offer — their sometimes outlandish independent paths, their distinctive styles fused with local culture — relativize Japanese KARATE and become a valuable mirror for rethinking how we ourselves should carry KARATE forward. It is easy to dismiss overseas KARATE as a “lesser version,” but that leaves our own field of vision narrow as well.

To know KARATE as seen from abroad is, in the end, to come back to knowing KARATE as seen from within Japan.

Principal References

This essay was composed under the author’s own responsibility, drawing on multiple sources including the following. The quoted passages are material for argument only, and do not amount to an endorsement of the claims of each source as they stand. The Reddit citations in particular are used solely to convey the raw voices of overseas practitioners.

In addition to the above, overseas martial-arts magazines (Black Belt Magazine, Classical Fighting Arts, Shotokan Karate Magazine, etc.), the official statements of the various organizations, YouTube channels (Jesse Enkamp, Iain Abernethy, Karate Culture, Karate Dojo waKu, etc.), and the author’s conversations with overseas practitioners and instructors were used as material for the argument. Readers wishing to verify any point more rigorously are encouraged to consult the primary sources and scholarly articles directly.

コメントする

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。 ※ が付いている欄は必須項目です

上部へスクロール